Hi Dericlee
I'm sorry you feel that this work is a failure. I think it is worth working on. I think the idea behind it is an excellent one.
I guess my problem, sitting in a very wet London, is twofold
Firstly, I see the tradition of Guy Fawkes as a celebration of the continuation of Monarchism (I'm sure that's not the right word but my brain doesn't always work well) over Republicanism, which is what would have happened had the plot been successful. Guy Fawkes was the scapegoat.
The word's probably 'monarchy' but I got your drift jsut fine. Actually this verse highlights that continued scapegoating very well. A point made very powerfully:
Quote:We learned so much
at your feet!
Yesterday's friend is today's enemy,
yesterday's enemy we still scorn.
We dress him in a Guy Fawkes mask
and call him a rose by any other name;
does he still stink?
I guess the other reason I missed your point was that I didn't sink in that in the "we" you were referring to America. It should have done.
Yeah...I just got throught telling Rick about the problems we sometimes have in trans-national websites, remembering just where the author comes from (and "is coming from" as it were.) Do Americans dress enemies in the garb of prior foes?
Yeah, I think we do. adding the prior line "Yesterday's friend is today's enemy" it may make more sense; we once backed Hussein (however ill-advisedly) but now we look at him as the modern equivalent of a Qaddafi or Khomenei. I probably haven't helped much but I do hope you can get your point across. It's worth it.
I wouldn't worry about it; it's the author's problem to make his intent clear. I really only gave you that one 'we' as a clue.