Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Send TopicPrint
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Burning Guy Fawkes (Read 631 times)
Just_Daniel
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


Slow down; things will
go faster. ~ djr

Posts: 8988
Location: South West New Jersey
Joined: Aug 2nd, 2003
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #14 - Sep 11th, 2008 at 12:43pm
Print Post  
Interesting piece, Eric.   

... and I must admi total ignorance to Mr. Fawkes until I consulted the ready article in Wikipedia.  I hardly remember high school, so whether I ever learned about him and his conspirators there is moot.

Thank you for making me wander into the mushy grey matter and stir up a few lazy cells.

deLighting in your sharing, Daniel  Cool
  
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
alanmdouglas
Gold Star Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 672
Location: UK
Joined: Jul 31st, 2003
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #13 - Sep 11th, 2008 at 9:45am
Print Post  
Dear Eric,

I have come to this only today, and have read the whole list of comments.

I have to disagree with you when you say the point is lost and you want to bury the poem.

IF you want historical accuracy, then there will need to be changes, but I feel you are making a good point, and that it CAN be polished up to your (and incidentally our) satisfaction.

Write on !

Love
Alan
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
EzraWrites
Full Member
***
Offline


These pretzels are making
me thirsty

Posts: 253
Location: California
Joined: May 29th, 2005
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #12 - Sep 10th, 2008 at 7:30am
Print Post  
You are of course correct Samson. I find most people have little interest in history so I sometimes paraphrase or distill it into something more recognisable. 

King Leopold of Belgium actually considered the Belgian Congo his own personal property. The main character Marlow was an Englishman hired by a Belgian trading company (if I remember correctly). 

The story compares the brutality of 'the highest of Western Civilisation', meaning the European nations like England, Belgium, France, Germany, Denmark...who all had holdings in Africa and around the world, with the brutality of the daily lives of the 'savages' of the very lands they colonised. Since England was far and away the greatest of the Western empires I used it as example. 

Glad you caught it. Maybe it will get someone who hasn't read The Heart of Darkness to do so. 

James
« Last Edit: Sep 10th, 2008 at 10:54pm by EzraWrites »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Samson
Full Member
***
Offline


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 38
Joined: Aug 10th, 2007
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #11 - Sep 9th, 2008 at 4:26pm
Print Post  
I thought Heart of Darkness was set in the Belgian Congo. Infact, I am quite certain of this. King Leopold, I believe. Alot of Colonialism in Africa. "Mini" Empires maybe.


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
EzraWrites
Full Member
***
Offline


These pretzels are making
me thirsty

Posts: 253
Location: California
Joined: May 29th, 2005
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #10 - Sep 7th, 2008 at 11:03pm
Print Post  

The first thing that came to mind when I read this was the Burning Man event held in Nevada. However the content herein and the Burning Man celebration have nothing in common and rather are like opposites. 

I hadn't ever read about the Gunpowder Plot or Guy Fawkes. I suppose it resembles the Boston Tea Party except with a much more direct intent! lol

This is certainly a remake of The Hollow Men by Elliot, and/or a draw on that. I think you did well with this Eric, though I didn't get many of the references on the first couple reads as I didn't knwo the history of Guy Fawkes as stated. 

The point the poem makes I think is spot on. We, America, have become the British Empire, which had become the Roman Empire. The novella 'The Heart of Darkness' addressed how Britain had gone from being a barbaric backwater in the Roman Empire, to treating the people's of Africa as the barbaric backwater of the English Empire. And now America deals with subordinates in much the same brutal way. The film Apocalypse Now was in fact a retelling of The Heart of Darkness with America as the empire. The whole point of The Heart of Darkness was how so-called civilised nations and people are as brutally barbaric as the peoples and nations considered uncivilised and barbaric. 

The Heart of Darkness  by the way was the genesis for T.S. Elliot's The Waste Land as well. The Hollow Men was made up of fragments of The Waste Land that Elliot and Pound had trimmed from it.

I don't think you should toss this Eric. 


James
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dericlee
Topic Starter Topic Starter
Gold Star Member
*****
Offline


"Shiny!  Let's be bad
guys."

Posts: 757
Location: Arizona Mountains
Joined: Mar 19th, 2004
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #9 - Sep 7th, 2008 at 9:21pm
Print Post  
nas wrote on Sep 7th, 2008 at 7:36pm:
Hi Dericlee

I'm sorry you feel that this work is a failure.  I think it is worth working on.  I think the idea behind it is an excellent one.

I guess my problem, sitting in a very wet London, is twofold 

Firstly, I see the tradition of Guy Fawkes as a celebration of the continuation of Monarchism (I'm sure that's not the right word but my brain doesn't always work well) over Republicanism, which is what would have happened had the plot been successful. Guy Fawkes was the scapegoat.

The word's probably 'monarchy' but I got your drift jsut fine.

Actually this verse highlights that continued scapegoating very well.  A point made very powerfully:

Quote:
We learned so much
at your feet!
Yesterday's friend is today's enemy,
yesterday's enemy we still scorn.
We dress him in a Guy Fawkes mask
and call him a rose by any other name;
does he still stink?


I guess the other reason I missed your point was that I didn't sink in that in the "we" you were referring to America.  It should have done.

Yeah...I just got throught telling Rick about the problems we sometimes have in trans-national websites, remembering just where the author comes from (and "is coming from" as it were.)

Do Americans dress enemies in the garb of prior foes?

Yeah, I think we do.  adding the prior line "Yesterday's friend is today's enemy" it may make more sense;  we once backed Hussein (however ill-advisedly) but now we look at him as the modern equivalent of a Qaddafi or Khomenei.

I probably haven't helped much but I do hope you can get your point across.  It's worth it.


I wouldn't worry about it; it's the author's problem to make his intent clear.  I really only gave you that one 'we' as a clue.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
nas
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 9444
Joined: Sep 11th, 2006
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #8 - Sep 7th, 2008 at 7:36pm
Print Post  
Hi Dericlee

I'm sorry you feel that this work is a failure.  I think it is worth working on.  I think the idea behind it is an excellent one.

I guess my problem, sitting in a very wet London, is twofold 

Firstly, I see the tradition of Guy Fawkes as a celebration of the continuation of Monarchism (I'm sure that's not the right word but my brain doesn't always work well) over Republicanism, which is what would have happened had the plot been successful. Guy Fawkes was the scapegoat.

Actually this verse highlights that continued scapegoating very well.  A point made very powerfully:

Quote:
We learned so much
at your feet!
Yesterday's friend is today's enemy,
yesterday's enemy we still scorn.
We dress him in a Guy Fawkes mask
and call him a rose by any other name;
does he still stink?


I guess the other reason I missed your point was that I didn't sink in that in the "we" you were referring to America.  It should have done.

Do Americans dress enemies in the garb of prior foes?

I probably haven't helped much but I do hope you can get your point across.  It's worth it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dericlee
Topic Starter Topic Starter
Gold Star Member
*****
Offline


"Shiny!  Let's be bad
guys."

Posts: 757
Location: Arizona Mountains
Joined: Mar 19th, 2004
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #7 - Sep 7th, 2008 at 4:05pm
Print Post  
Well, with each new response, I see what a failure this work actually was, and I can't even see it as worth a rewrite; the point was lost.

This poem was not meant to be taken as a commentary on England but on America...on how we took up the torch of Imperialism, how we paint yesterdays friends as today's enemies (Hussein comes to mind) and how we dress those enemies in the garb of prior foes.  In short, how we ended up being everything we once hated about England.

But it seems I painted myself into a corner with a metaphor that came across too literally.

Maybe it will be worth keeping, for what was seen in it, but it's a total loss for what I hoped might be seen instead.

Thanks, everyone, for the comments.  

[sigh]

Back to the drawing board.
« Last Edit: Sep 7th, 2008 at 4:08pm by dericlee »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
prosaic
Gold Star Member
*****
Offline


I Love Cafe Poetica!

Posts: 436
Location: UK
Joined: Apr 9th, 2008
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #6 - Aug 25th, 2008 at 7:59am
Print Post  
Hi,

I'm not sure if there is confusion here or if I am confused in thinking there is. (!)

In addition to Nas's post, I would add that the plot was religious, anti-monarchial and political. This is because in England in them-there days (as in many areas of the World today) religion = politics.

Throughout the Tudors' and Stuarts' reigns (We are now in the Windsor dynasty) there was a power-struggle betwixt the prods and the RCs for power. Plots were a plenty and executions for treason and plot (actual or perceived) frequent.

England was a RC country before Henry VIII formed the Church of England because he was hacked-off by the Pope's denial of his divorce. From then on the two sides lambasted each other, chopping and changing until, finally, the Civil War was won by Parliamentarians who executed the then King (Charles I). However, his son (Charles II) later returned from exile to take his throne - but it was a throne no longer with absolute power: control had moved to the secular (though protestant in members) Parliament.

Today HM The Queen is head of the Church of England (there is a large American branch of the Anglican church) but she is a constitutional monarch. The CofE is the established church - unlike in the USA where the Founding Fathers deliberately split state and church. Ironically, however, Christianity is very unimportant in the UK, compared to the USA.

Apropos the Gunpowder Plot to explode Parliament: Guy Fawkes was only one of the conspirators but seems to have become the most famous. They were caught and tortured for information than hung, drawn and quartered - the crime High Treason.

We still burn effigies of Fawkes on bonfires on the Fifth of November - though York Grammar school does not. Fawkes was an old boy there and the school refuses to burn old boys, whatever their crimes.

Only in the last few years have we finally begun to lay to rest this historic prod-RC schism - with the power-sharing in Northern Ireland.

ep.




« Last Edit: Aug 25th, 2008 at 8:00am by prosaic »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Normpo
Forum Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 10839
Joined: Aug 2nd, 2003
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #5 - Aug 20th, 2008 at 3:35pm
Print Post  
I really assumed most all folks know of the Gunpowder Plot and Fawkes... I certainly remember the tale from my High School days.

The guy also escaped being quartered alive (those Brits did have a way of disposing of their prisoners, didn't they) by jumping to off a scaffold (I think) and breaking his neck (death).

Ugh being quartered alive was not a good thought to have just before lunch.

Norm
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dericlee
Topic Starter Topic Starter
Gold Star Member
*****
Offline


"Shiny!  Let's be bad
guys."

Posts: 757
Location: Arizona Mountains
Joined: Mar 19th, 2004
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #4 - Aug 20th, 2008 at 2:54pm
Print Post  
Hi, Nas.

Duly noted and corrected; I went back to check the text and I can only forgive myself (this time)  'cause the syntax was so garbled ya really had to already know what it was saying before reading for it to make a bit of sense!  But yeah...the plot was Papist, not the monarch.  (I might have known that, if I'd remembered my readings after high school.  It's hardly likely that the author of Basilikon Doronwould have been Catholic.  *blush* )

Nice catch, thanks.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
nas
Supreme Member
*****
Offline


I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 9444
Joined: Sep 11th, 2006
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #3 - Aug 20th, 2008 at 11:28am
Print Post  
Hi Eric

In Britain we do indeed have a tradition of burning an effigy of Guy Fawkes on the bonfire.  It's a celebration usually accompanied by lots of fireworks..

    “Remember, remember the fifth of November,
    The gunpowder, treason and plot,
    I know of no reason
    Why the gunpowder treason
    Should ever be forgot.” 

The tradition goes back to what is commonly known as the Gunpowder Plot.

Guy Fawkes was a Catholic, in charge of a plot to blow up the then King, James 1, and the Houses of Parliament.  They hid barrels of gunpowder in a cellar under the House of Lords but the plot was discovered and those involved hanged.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dericlee
Topic Starter Topic Starter
Gold Star Member
*****
Offline


"Shiny!  Let's be bad
guys."

Posts: 757
Location: Arizona Mountains
Joined: Mar 19th, 2004
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #2 - Aug 19th, 2008 at 11:35pm
Print Post  
The English have a tradition on the fifth of November,where they burn a straw man.  Often it was an effigy of Fawkes.  Later, it was an effigy of the Pope. 

Another part of that celebration is igniting tar barrels and rolling them down the streets.  (No one seems to know why.)

This was originally written for a predominantly English audience...I suppose manners could have suggested I give us poor Yanks a little more background, hmm?


Oh...Guy Fawkes Night is also known as Bonfire Night.
« Last Edit: Aug 20th, 2008 at 2:44pm by dericlee »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Normpo
Forum Administrator
*****
Offline



Posts: 10839
Joined: Aug 2nd, 2003
Re: Burning Guy Fawkes
Reply #1 - Aug 19th, 2008 at 10:58pm
Print Post  
Eric,

Oh I am going to have settle into this one when I have more time. I am very familiar with Mr. Fawkes and his attempt to set the barrels ablaze. They didn't get BURN him though -- they's planned to hang him and quarter him but he deliberately jumped and broke his own neck to cheat them of their fun.

There'a a lot to chew on here --- I'll be back and try offer a critique.

Norm
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dericlee
Topic Starter Topic Starter
Gold Star Member
*****
Offline


"Shiny!  Let's be bad
guys."

Posts: 757
Location: Arizona Mountains
Joined: Mar 19th, 2004
Burning Guy Fawkes
Aug 19th, 2008 at 4:01pm
Print Post  
Burning Guy Fawkes


Contented, stifled MotherLanders
staggering through 
Bonfire Night celebration,
do you still burn the straw men, 
the Pope, or old Guy Fawkes?
(Now, there's irony for you!)
Still roll the tar barrels all ablaze?

Is this the way the world ends 
not with a bang 

but a cinder?


We learned so much
at your feet!
Yesterday's friend is today's enemy,
yesterday's enemy we still scorn.
We dress him in a Guy Fawkes mask
and call him a rose by any other name;
does he still stink?

...and now 
we've made the top; 
more reviled than you
in every venue.  Can you
hear the cries?   
"Mistah Kurtz—he dead."

But so are so many others, 
and the roll rises
at the call
and the toll rises
with each fall
as the role descends
into a hell
undreamed
and I wonder, still
do you still rock the house
roll the barrel
toll the bells

burning Guy Fawkes?   





© eric eee
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send TopicPrint